What constitutes a dissenting opinion?

A dissenting opinion is written by a justice who disagrees with the majority decision in a court case. This means that while the majority may rule in favor of a particular interpretation of the law or the facts of the case, the dissenting opinion provides an alternative viewpoint and reasoning that counters that majority perspective.

Dissenting opinions are important because they can highlight different interpretations of the law and may influence future cases or court decisions. They contribute to the legal discourse by allowing justices to express their differing views on legal principles, which can be considered by future courts or legislatures. Such opinions can serve as a foundation for future arguments or changes in the law, reflecting the dynamic nature of legal interpretation.

In contrast, an opinion agreeing with the majority verdict or an opinion that expresses agreement with the majority decision does not constitute dissent. Similarly, opinions that are not published or shared do not fulfill the role of dissenting opinions in the judicial process.