In the context of forfeiture of constitutional rights, which court would typically address these issues?

Federal courts typically address issues related to the forfeiture of constitutional rights because these rights are enshrined in the U.S. Constitution, which is a federal document. When there are allegations of violations of constitutional rights, such as due process violations or unlawful seizures, these matters often invoke federal law and principles which are interpreted and enforced by federal courts.

Federal courts have jurisdiction over cases that involve federal statutes, constitutional questions, or issues that cross state lines, making them the appropriate venue for addressing the loss or infringement of constitutional guarantees. This includes cases that arise from actions by federal agencies or officials where constitutional rights claim violations are central to the case.

While state courts also adjudicate many matters involving civil rights, they typically handle state laws and regulations rather than constitutional issues directly arising under federal law. Similarly, international courts do not generally involve themselves in disputes over U.S. constitutional rights, and local courts primarily deal with municipal or state law issues. Thus, federal courts are specifically equipped to handle cases concerning the forfeiture of constitutional rights due to their scope and jurisdiction.